Showing posts with label READ THIS NOW American Fascist Take Over. Show all posts
Showing posts with label READ THIS NOW American Fascist Take Over. Show all posts

Monday, February 7, 2011

Top 100 Items to Disappear First During a National Emergency

Top 100 Items to Disappear First During a National Emergency




Top 100 Items to Disappear First During a National Emergency

1. Generators (Good ones cost dearly. Gas storage, risky. Noisy...target of thieves; maintenance etc.)
2. Water Filters/Purifiers
3. Portable Toilets
4. Seasoned Firewood. Wood takes about 6 - 12 months to become dried, for home uses.
5. Lamp Oil, Wicks, Lamps (First Choice: Buy CLEAR oil. If scarce, stockpile ANY!)
6. Coleman Fuel. Impossible to stockpile too much.
7. Guns, Ammunition, Pepper Spray, Knives, Clubs, Bats & Slingshots.
8. Hand-can openers, & hand egg beaters, whisks.
9. Honey/Syrups/white, brown sugar
10. Rice - Beans - Wheat
11. Vegetable Oil (for cooking) Without it food burns/must be boiled etc.,)
12. Charcoal, Lighter Fluid (Will become scarce suddenly)
13. Water Containers (Urgent Item to obtain.) Any size. Small: HARD CLEAR PLASTIC ONLY - note - food grade if for drinking.
16. Propane Cylinders (Urgent: Definite shortages will occur.)
17. Survival Guide Book.
18. Mantles: Aladdin, Coleman, etc. (Without this item, longer-term lighting is difficult.)
19. Baby Supplies: Diapers/formula. ointments/aspirin, etc.
20. Washboards, Mop Bucket w/wringer (for Laundry)
21. Cookstoves (Propane, Coleman & Kerosene)
22. Vitamins
23. Propane Cylinder Handle-Holder (Urgent: Small canister use is dangerous without this item)
24. Feminine Hygiene/Haircare/Skin products.
25. Thermal underwear (Tops & Bottoms)
26. Bow saws, axes and hatchets, Wedges (also, honing oil)
27. Aluminum Foil Reg. & Heavy Duty (Great Cooking and Barter Item)
28. Gasoline Containers (Plastic & Metal)
29. Garbage Bags (Impossible To Have Too Many).
30. Toilet Paper, Kleenex, Paper Towels
31. Milk - Powdered & Condensed (Shake Liquid every 3 to 4 months)
32. Garden Seeds (Non-Hybrid) (A MUST)
33. Clothes pins/line/hangers (A MUST)
34. Coleman's Pump Repair Kit
35. Tuna Fish (in oil)
36. Fire Extinguishers (or..large box of Baking Soda in every room)
37. First aid kits
38. Batteries (all sizes...buy furthest-out for Expiration Dates)
39. Garlic, spices & vinegar, baking supplies
40. Big Dogs (and plenty of dog food)
41. Flour, yeast & salt
42. Matches. {"Strike Anywhere" preferred.) Boxed, wooden matches will go first
43. Writing paper/pads/pencils, solar calculators
44. Insulated ice chests (good for keeping items from freezing in Wintertime.)
45. Workboots, belts, Levis & durable shirts
46. Flashlights/LIGHTSTICKS & torches, "No. 76 Dietz" Lanterns
47. Journals, Diaries & Scrapbooks (jot down ideas, feelings, experience; Historic Times)
48. Garbage cans Plastic (great for storage, water, transporting - if with wheels)
49. Men's Hygiene: Shampoo, Toothbrush/paste, Mouthwash/floss, nail clippers, etc
50. Cast iron cookware (sturdy, efficient)
51. Fishing supplies/tools
52. Mosquito coils/repellent, sprays/creams
53. Duct Tape
54. Tarps/stakes/twine/nails/rope/spikes
55. Candles
56. Laundry Detergent (liquid)
57. Backpacks, Duffel Bags
58. Garden tools & supplies
59. Scissors, fabrics & sewing supplies
60. Canned Fruits, Veggies, Soups, stews, etc.
61. Bleach (plain, NOT scented: 4 to 6% sodium hypochlorite)
62. Canning supplies, (Jars/lids/wax)
63. Knives & Sharpening tools: files, stones, steel
64. Bicycles...Tires/tubes/pumps/chains, etc
65. Sleeping Bags & blankets/pillows/mats
66. Carbon Monoxide Alarm (battery powered)
67. Board Games, Cards, Dice
68. d-con Rat poison, MOUSE PRUFE II, Roach Killer
69. Mousetraps, Ant traps & cockroach magnets
70. Paper plates/cups/utensils (stock up, folks)
71. Baby wipes, oils, waterless & Antibacterial soap (saves a lot of water)
72. Rain gear, rubberized boots, etc.
73. Shaving supplies (razors & creams, talc, after shave)
74. Hand pumps & siphons (for water and for fuels)
75. Soysauce, vinegar, bullions/gravy/soupbase
76. Reading glasses
77. Chocolate/Cocoa/Tang/Punch (water enhancers)
78. "Survival-in-a-Can"
79. Woolen clothing, scarves/ear-muffs/mittens
80. Boy Scout Handbook, / also Leaders Catalog
81. Roll-on Window Insulation Kit (MANCO)
82. Graham crackers, saltines, pretzels, Trail mix/Jerky
83. Popcorn, Peanut Butter, Nuts
84. Socks, Underwear, T-shirts, etc. (extras)
85. Lumber (all types)
86. Wagons & carts (for transport to and from)
87. Cots & Inflatable mattress's
88. Gloves: Work/warming/gardening, etc.
89. Lantern Hangers
90. Screen Patches, glue, nails, screws,, nuts & bolts
91. Teas
92. Coffee
93. Cigarettes
94. Wine/Liquors (for bribes, medicinal, etc,)
95. Paraffin wax
96. Glue, nails, nuts, bolts, screws, etc.
97. Chewing gum/candies
98. Atomizers (for cooling/bathing)
99. Hats & cotton neckerchiefs
100. Livestock

Saturday, March 13, 2010

President Obama backs DNA test in arrests

President Obama backs DNA test in arrests


By JOSH GERSTEIN | 3/9/10 4:57 AM EST

President Barack Obama’s embrace of a national database to store the DNA of people arrested but not necessarily convicted of a crime is heartening to backers of the policy but disappointing to criminal-justice reformers, who view it as an invasion of privacy.

Others also worry the practice would adversely affect minorities.

In an interview aired Saturday on “America’s Most Wanted,” Obama expressed strong agreement as host John Walsh extolled the virtues of collecting DNA at the time of an arrest and putting it into a single, national database.

“We have 18 states who are taking DNA upon arrest,” Walsh said. “It’s no different than fingerprinting or a booking photo. ... Since those states have been doing it, it has cleared 200 people that are innocent from jail.”

“It’s the right thing to do,” Obama replied. “This is where the national registry becomes so important, because what you have is individual states — they may have a database, but if they’re not sharing it with the state next door, you’ve got a guy from Illinois driving over into Indiana, and they’re not talking to each other.”

Erin Runnion, whose 5-year-old daughter Samantha was murdered in 2002, was delighted at Obama’s remarks. “I am thrilled that the president seems to be supportive of DNA upon felony arrest. I think we’ll prevent future crimes across this country by doing it,” she said. “I’m absolutely 100 percent in favor of it.”

Some opponents of the idea, though, were taken aback.

“I’m actually surprised he would give an answer like that,” said Deborah Peterson Small of Break the Chains, which studies the impact of drug laws on minority groups. “I’d think he and people around him would know that collecting DNA samples from arrestees is more controversial than collecting it from people who’ve been convicted.”

“It’s a horrible idea — tremendously invasive,” said Bill Quigley of the Center for Constitutional Rights, who also disputed Walsh’s claim that DNA is no different from fingerprints.

“It’s like a hair sample, looking at your health care records and everything else,” Quigley said. “It’s like giving a blank check to the government — a blank check they can cash anytime they feel like it.”

In a provocative report two years ago, titled “Building Jim Crow’s Database,” Small and other critics charged that DNA-upon-arrest provisions disproportionately affect minorities because they are more likely to be arrested, even if not convicted.

“It’s racially incredibly skewed,” she said.

A White House spokesman declined to explain or elaborate on Obama’s remarks.

In 2004, Californians overwhelmingly passed a ballot measure requiring DNA testing, usually by a swab inside the cheek, for all felony arrests and some others. And in New York City, Mayor Michael Bloomberg has sought to go even further, proposing DNA tests for everyone arrested in the city, even for misdemeanors.

Just days before Obama took office, the Bush administration implemented a 2006 law to take DNA from federal arrestees, including immigration detainees. Court challenges to DNA-upon-arrest programs are under way, encountering mixed results.

The federal system and many states allow arrestees to seek to remove their DNA from the database when they are acquitted or never charged. But officials say such requests are rarely made.

Criminologist James Fox of Northeastern University in Boston said he was surprised by Obama’s comment on DNA-upon-arrest and by his decision even to do an interview with the crime-focused TV show.

“There’s always been controversy about ‘America’s Most Wanted,’ not just among civil libertarians but [also among] criminologists, about telling the public to be on the lookout for a guy who looks like this fellow,” Fox said.

Walsh stressed in the exchange with Obama that his show is “not about Americans being vigilantes or anything like that.”

Fox also said he wouldn’t recommend DNA-upon-arrest to Obama as a priority. “I’d much rather see him deal with ballistic fingerprinting and repeal of the Tiahrt Amendment,” which limits gun tracing, Fox said.

Small said Obama’s comments in the interview underscored her concern that the administration hasn’t done much to root out unfairness in the criminal-justice system.

“I supported Obama. I still support Obama,” she said. “I’m very disappointed. He’s done next to nothing in the area of criminal-justice reform.”


Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34097.html#ixzz0i3GPhtVi

Friday, March 12, 2010

20 Signs That The United States Is Rapidly Becoming A Totalitarian Big Brother Police State

20 Signs That The United States Is Rapidly Becoming A Totalitarian Big Brother Police State

By Michael Snyder - BLN Contributing Writer

Once upon a time, the United States was a land of unparalleled freedom. The rest of the world envied the freedom that ordinary Americans had to think, say and do what they wanted. But all of that has changed. Now Americans have to fear that they will be tackled by a squad of security goons and dragged off to a detention facility somewhere if they spill a Pepsi on a flight attendant or take a few too many pictures of a public building. The United States used to be the polar opposite of totalitarian regimes like Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, but now America is rapidly becoming very much like them. Due to the fear of a boogeyman living in a cave somewhere or some guy with explosive powder in his underwear we are all being forced to give up our freedoms and learn to live in a Big Brother police state.

But have things really changed so much that we have to give up all of the cherished freedoms that our fathers and grandfathers fought and died for? Haven't there always been fanatics and crazies and criminals out there? Why do we suddenly have to become so afraid of them?

In the past, Americans would not let anyone make them live in fear. If some unbalanced individual did something bad, it wasn't the end of the world, was it? No, in the past Americans dusted themselves off and continued to live as free men and women. You see, when we live in fear and radically alter our way of life just to feel a little more secure, we lose. We have let someone else steal our freedom and our dignity.

But now in the name of "security" all kinds of bizarre proposals have been implemented on the local, state and national levels. Somehow we think that if everything that we do is watched, monitored and analyzed we will all be safer somehow.

Maybe we are safer and maybe we aren't, but we are certainly a whole lot less free.The following are 20 signs that the United States is rapidly becoming a totalitarian "Big Brother" police state....

#1) A new bill being pushed by Senators John McCain and Joe Lieberman would allow the U.S. military to round up large numbers of Americans and detain them indefinitely without a trial if they "pose a threat" or if they have "potential intelligence value" or for any other reason the President of the United States "considers appropriate".

#2) Lawmakers in Washington D.C. working to create a new immigration bill have decided on a way to prevent employers from hiring illegal immigrants: a national biometric identification card all American workers would be required to obtain.

#3) Barack Obama is backing a plan to create a national database to store the DNA of people who have been arrested but not necessarily convicted of a crime.

#4) Just to get on an airplane, Americans will now have to go through new full-body scanners that reveal every detail of our exposed bodies to airport security officials.

#5) If that wasn't bad enough, the Transportation Security Administration has announced that airport screeners will begin roving through airports randomly taking chemical swabs from passengers and their bags to check for explosives.

#6) Starting this upcoming December, some passengers on Canadian airlines flying to, from or even over the United States without ever landing there, will only be allowed to board their flights once the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has determined they are not terrorists.

#7) Organic milk is such a threat that the FDA has been conducting military style raidson Amish farmers in Pennsylvania.

#8) An NYPD officer has broken his silence and has confessed that innocent citizens are being set up and falsely arrested and ticketed in order to meet quotas.

#9) A growing number of police departments across the U.S. are turning to mobile camera systems in order to fight motor vehicle theft and identify unregistered cars.

#10) For decades, Arizona has been known as "the sunset state", but lately many frustrated residents have started calling it "the surveillance state".

#11) Judges and police in Florida have been caught using "secret codes" on tickets in the state of Florida.

#12) An extensive investigation has revealed that between 2003 and 2007, that state of Texas quietly gave hundreds of newborn baby blood samples to a U.S. Armed Forces laboratory for use in a forensics database.

#13) A 6-year-old girl was recently handcuffed and sent to a mental facility after throwing temper tantrums at her elementary school.

#14) One 12-year-old girl in New York was recently arrested and marched out of her school in handcuffs just because she doodled on her desk.

#15) In Florida, students have been arrested by police for things as simple as bringing a plastic butter knife to school, throwing an eraser, and drawing a picture of a gun.

#16) When a mother on a flight to Denver spanked both of her children and cussed out a flight attendant who tried to intervene, she suddenly found herself handcuffed and headed for prison. Why? She was charged with being a domestic terrorist under the Patriot Act.

#17) A new global treaty may force U.S. Internet service providers to spy on what you do online.

#18) A leaked Obama administration memo has revealed plans for the federal governmentto seize more than 10 million acres of land from Montana to New Mexico.

#19) 56 percent of Americans questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll said that the U.S. government has become so large and powerful that it poses an immediate threat to the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens.

#20) But one other recent poll found that 51 percent of Americans agree with this statement: "It is necessary to give up some civil liberties in order to make the country safe from terrorism."

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Brain scan can read people's thoughts: researchers

Brain scan can read people's thoughts: researchers

Brain scan can read people's thoughts: researchersAFP/File – A hospital employee performs a magnetic resonance scan on a patient in 2009. A scan of brain activity …

WASHINGTON (AFP) – A scan of brain activity can effectively read a person's mind, researchers said Thursday.

British scientists from University College London found they could differentiate brain activity linked to different memories and thereby identify thought patterns by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

The evidence suggests researchers can tell which memory of a past event a person is recalling from the pattern of their brain activity alone.

"We've been able to look at brain activity for a specific episodic memory -- to look at actual memory traces," said senior author of the study, Eleanor Maguire.

"We found that our memories are definitely represented in the hippocampus. Now that we've seen where they are, we have an opportunity to understand how memories are stored and how they may change through time."

The results, reported in the March 11 online edition of Current Biology, follow an earlier discovery by the same team that they could tell where a person was standing within a virtual reality room in the same way.

The researchers say the new results move this line of research along because episodic memories -- recollections of everyday events -- are expected to be more complex, and thus more difficult to crack thanspatial memory.

In the study, Maguire and her colleagues Martin Chadwick, Demis Hassabis, and Nikolaus Weiskopf showed 10 people each three very short films before brain scanning. Each movie featured a different actress and a fairly similar everyday scenario.

The researchers scanned the participants' brains while the participants were asked to recall each of the films. The researchers then ran the imaging data through a computer algorithm designed to identify patterns in the brain activity associated with memories for each of the films.

Finally, they showed that those patterns could be identified to accurately predict which film a given person was thinking about when he or she was scanned.

The results imply that the traces of episodic memories are found in the brain, and are identifiable, even over many re-activations, the researchers said.

The results reinforce the findings of a 2008 US study that showed similar scans can determine what images people are seeing based on brain activity.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100311/hl_afp/scienceresearchusbritainpsychology_20100311174114

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010: You are the terrorist now

A Detention Bill You Ought to Read More Carefully

MAR 5 2010, 3:40 PM ET

Why is the national security community treating the "Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010," introduced by Sens. John McCain and Joseph Lieberman on Thursday as a standard proposal, as a simple response to the administration's choices in the aftermath of the Christmas Day bombing attempt? A close reading of the bill suggests it would allow the U.S. military to detain U.S. citizens without trial indefinitely in the U.S. based on suspected activity. Read the bill here, and then read the summarized points after the jump.
According to the summary, the bill sets out a comprehensive policy for the detention, interrogation and trial of suspected enemy belligerents who are believed to have engaged in hostilities against the United States by requiring these individuals to be held in military custody, interrogated for their intelligence value and not provided with a Miranda warning.

(There is no distinction between U.S. persons--visa holders or citizens--and non-U.S. persons.)

It would require these "belligerents" to be coded as "high-value detainee[s]" to be held in military custody and interrogated for their intelligence value by a High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team established by the president. (The H.I.G., of course, was established to bring a sophisticated interrogation capacity to the federal justice system.)

Any suspected unprivileged enemy belligerents considered a "high-value detainee" shall not be provided with a Miranda warning.

The bill asks the President to determine criteria for designating an individual as a "high-value detainee" if he/she: (1) poses a threat of an attack on civilians or civilian facilities within the U.S. or U.S. facilities abroad; (2) poses a threat to U.S. military personnel or U.S. military facilities; (3) potential intelligence value; (4) is a member of al Qaeda or a terrorist group affiliated with al Qaeda or (5) such other matters as the President considers appropriate. The President must submit the regulations and guidance to the appropriate committees of Congress no later than 60 days after enactment.

To the extent possible, the High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team must make a preliminary determination whether the detainee is an unprivileged enemy belligerent within 48 hours of taking detainee into custody.

The High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team must submit its determination to the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General after consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. The Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General make a final determination and report the determination to the President and the appropriate committees of Congress. In the case of any disagreement between the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General, the President will make the determination.

This is the Bill every line is evil:

111THCONGRESS

2DSESSION

S. ll

To provide for the interrogation and detention of enemy belligerents who

commit hostile acts against the United States, to establish certain limita-

tions on the prosecution of such belligerents for such acts, and for

other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

llllllllll

Mr. MCCAINintroduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on

llllllllll

A BILL

To provide for the interrogation and detention of enemy

belligerents who commit hostile acts against the United

States, to establish certain limitations on the prosecution

of such belligerents for such acts, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-

1

tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

2

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

3

This Act may be cited as the


‘‘Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010’’.

5

March 4, 2010 (12:06 p.m.)

2

ARM10090 S.L.C.

SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF SUSPECTED UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY

BELLIGERENTS IN MILITARY CUSTODY.

2

(a) MILITARYCUSTODYREQUIREMENT.—Whenever

3

within the United States, its territories, and possessions,

4

or outside the territorial limits of the United States, an

5

individual is captured or otherwise comes into the custody

6

or under the effective control of the United States who

7

is suspected of engaging in hostilities against the United

8

States or its coalition partners through an act of ter-

9

rorism, or by other means in violation of the laws of war,

10

or of purposely and materially supporting such hostilities,

11

and who may be an unprivileged enemy belligerent, the

12

individual shall be placed in military custody for purposes

13

of initial interrogation and determination of status in ac-

14

cordance with the provisions of this Act.

15

(b) REASONABLE DELAY FOR INTELLIGENCE AC-

16

TIVITIES.—An individual who may be an unprivileged

17

enemy belligerent and who is initially captured or other-

18

wise comes into the custody or under the effective control

19

of the United States by an intelligence agency of the

20

United States may be held, interrogated, or transported

21

by the intelligence agency and placed into military custody

22

for purposes of this Act if retained by the United States

23

within a reasonable time after the capture or coming into

24

the custody or effective control by the intelligence agency,

25

giving due consideration to operational needs and require-

26

March 4, 2010 (12:06 p.m.)

3

ARM10090 S.L.C.

ments to avoid compromise or disclosure of an intelligence

1

mission or intelligence sources or methods.

2


SEC. 3. INTERROGATION AND DETERMINATION OF STATUS

OF SUSPECTED UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY BELLIGERENTS.

5

(a) ESTABLISHMENTOFINTERROGATIONGROUPS.—

6

(1) ESTABLISHMENTAUTHORIZED.—The Presi-

7

dent is authorized to establish an interagency team

8

for purposes as follows:

9

(A) To interrogate under subsection (b) in-

10

dividuals placed in military custody under sec-

11

tion 2.

12

(B) To make under subsection (c)(1) a

13

preliminary determination of the status of indi-

14

viduals described in section 2.

15

(2) COMPOSITION.—Each interagency team

16

under this subsection shall be composed of such per-

17

sonnel of the Executive Branch having expertise in

18

matters relating to national security, terrorism, in-

19

telligence, interrogation, or law enforcement as the

20

President considers appropriate. The members of

21

any particular interagency team may vary depending

22

on the skills most relevant to a particular case.

23

(3) DESIGNATIONS.—

24

March 4, 2010 (12:06 p.m.)

4

ARM10090 S.L.C.

(A) HIGH-VALUE DETAINEE.An indi-

1

vidual placed in military custody under section

2

2 shall, while subject to interrogation and de-

3

termination of status under this section, be re-

4

ferred to as a ‘‘high-value detainee’’ if the indi-

5

vidual meets the criteria for treatment as such

6

established in the regulations required by sub-

7

section (d).

8

(B) HIGH-VALUE DETAINEE INTERROGA-

9

TIONGROUP.—An interagency team established

10

under this subsection shall be known as a

11

‘‘high-value detainee interrogation group’’.

12

(b) INTERROGATIONS.—

13

(1) INTERROGATIONS TO BE CONDUCTED BY

14

HIGH-VALUEDETAINEEINTERROGATIONGROUP.—A

15

high-value detainee interrogation group established

16

under this section shall conduct the interrogations of

17

each high-value detainee.

18

(2) UTILIZATION OF OTHER PERSONNEL.—A

19

high-value detainee interrogation group may utilize

20

military and intelligence personnel, and Federal,

21

State, and local law enforcement personnel, in con-

22

ducting interrogations of a high-value detainee. The

23

utilization of such personnel for the interrogation of

24

a detainee shall not alter the responsibility of the in-

25

March 4, 2010 (12:06 p.m.)

5

ARM10090 S.L.C.

terrogation group for the coordination within the

1

Executive Branch of the interrogation of the de-

2

tainee or the determination of status and disposition

3

of the detainee under this Act.

4

(3) INAPPLICABILITYOFCERTAINSTATEMENT

5

AND RIGHTS.A individual who is suspected of

6

being an unprivileged enemy belligerent shall not,

7

during interrogation under this subsection, be pro-

8

vided the statement required by Miranda v. Arizona

9

(384 U.S. 436 (1966)) or otherwise be informed of

10

any rights that the individual may or may not have

11

to counsel or to remain silent consistent with Mi-

12

randa v. Arizona.

13

(c) DETERMINATIONSOFSTATUS.—

14

(1) PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION BY HIGH-

15

VALUE DETAINEE INTERROGATION GROUP.—The

16

high-value detainee interrogation group responsible

17

for interrogating a high-value detainee under sub-

18

section (b) shall make a preliminary determination

19

whether or not the detainee is an unprivileged enemy

20

belligerent. The interrogation group shall make such

21

determination based on the result of its interroga-

22

tion of the individual and on all intelligence informa-

23

tion available to the interrogation group. The inter-

24

rogation group shall, after consultation with the Di-

25

March 4, 2010 (12:06 p.m.)

6

ARM10090 S.L.C.

rector of National Intelligence, the Director of the

1

Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of

2

the Central Intelligence Agency, submit such deter-

3

mination to the Secretary of Defense and the Attor-

4

ney General.

5

(2) FINALDETERMINATION.—As soon as pos-

6

sible after receipt of a preliminary determination of

7

status with respect to a high-value detainee under

8

paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense and the At-

9

torney General shall jointly submit to the President

10

and to the appropriate committees of Congress a

11

final determination whether or not the detainee is an

12

unprivileged enemy belligerent for purposes of this

13

Act. In the event of a disagreement between the Sec-

14

retary of Defense and the Attorney General, the

15

President shall make the final determination.

16

(3) DEADLINEFORDETERMINATIONS.—All ac-

17

tions required regarding a high-value detainee under

18

this subsection shall, to the extent practicable, be

19

completed not later than 48 hours after the detainee

20

is placed in military custody under section 2.

21

(d) REGULATIONS.—

22

(1) INGENERAL.—The operations and activities

23

of high-value detainee interrogation groups under

24

this section shall be governed by such regulations

25

March 4, 2010 (12:06 p.m.)

7

ARM10090 S.L.C.

and guidance as the President shall establish for

1

purposes of implementing this section. The regula-

2

tions shall specify the officer or officers of the Exec-

3

utive Branch responsible for determining whether an

4

individual placed in military custody under section 2

5

meets the criteria for treatment as a high-value de-

6

tainee for purposes of interrogation and determina-

7

tion of status by a high-value interrogation group

8

under this section.

9

(2) CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATIONOF INDIVID-

10

UALSASHIGH-VALUEDETAINEES.—The regulations

11

required by this subsection shall include criteria for

12

designating an individual as a high-value detainee

13

based on the following:

14

(A) The potential threat the individual

15

poses for an attack on civilians or civilian facili-

16

ties within the United States or upon United

17

States citizens or United States civilian facili-

18

ties abroad at the time of capture or when com-

19

ing under the custody or control of the United

20

States.

21

(B) The potential threat the individual

22

poses to United States military personnel or

23

United States military facilities at the time of

8

ARM10090 S.L.C.

capture or when coming under the custody or

1

control of the United States.

2

(C) The potential intelligence value of the

3

individual.

4

(D) Membership in al Qaeda or in a ter-

5

rorist group affiliated with al Qaeda.

6

(E) Such other matters as the President

7

considers appropriate.

8

(3) PARAMOUNT PURPOSE OF INTERROGA-

9

TIONS.—The regulations required by this subsection

10

shall provide that the paramount purpose of the in-

11

terrogation of high-value detainees under this Act

12

shall be the protection of United States civilians and

13

United States civilian facilities through thorough

14

and professional interrogation for intelligence pur-

15

poses.

16

(4) SUBMITTALTOCONGRESS.—The President

17

shall submit the regulations and guidance required

18

by this subsection to the appropriate committees of

19

Congress not later than 60 days after the date of

20

the enactment of this Act.

21

SEC. 4. LIMITATION ON PROSECUTION OF ALIEN

22

UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY BELLIGERENTS.

23

(a) LIMITATION.—No funds appropriated or other-

24

wise made available to the Department of Justice may be

25

March 4, 2010 (12:06 p.m.)

9

ARM10090 S.L.C.

used to prosecute in an Article III court in the United

1

States, or in any territory or possession of the United

2

States, any alien who has been determined to be an

3

unprivileged enemy belligerent under section 3(c)(2).

4

(b) APPLICABILITY PENDING FINAL DETERMINA-

5

TIONOFSTATUS.—While a final determination on the sta-

6

tus of an alien high-value detainee is pending under sec-

7

tion 3(c)(2), the alien shall be treated as an unprivileged

8

enemy belligerent for purposes of subsection (a).

9

SEC. 5. DETENTION WITHOUT TRIAL OF UNPRIVILEGED

10 ENEMY BELLIGERENTS.

11

An individual, including a citizen of the United

12

States, determined to be an unprivileged enemy belligerent

13

under section 3(c)(2) in a manner which satisfies Article

14

5 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of

15

Prisoners of War may be detained without criminal

16

charges and without trial for the duration of hostilities

17

against the United States or its coalition partners in which

18

the individual has engaged, or which the individual has

19

purposely and materially supported, consistent with the

20

law of war and any authorization for the use of 9

ARM10090 S.L.C.

used to prosecute in an Article III court in the United

1

States, or in any territory or possession of the United

2

States, any alien who has been determined to be an

3

unprivileged enemy belligerent under section 3(c)(2).

4

(b) APPLICABILITY PENDING FINAL DETERMINA-

5

TIONOFSTATUS.—While a final determination on the sta-

6

tus of an alien high-value detainee is pending under sec-

7

tion 3(c)(2), the alien shall be treated as an unprivileged

8

enemy belligerent for purposes of subsection (a).


ARM10090 S.L.C.

(1) ACTOFTERRORISM.—The term ‘‘act of ter-

1

rorism’’ means an act of terrorism as that term is

2

defined in section 101(16) of the Homeland Security

3

Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101(16)).

4

(2) ALIEN.—The term ‘‘alien’’ means an indi-

5

vidual who is not a citizen of the United States.

6

(3) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CON-

7

GRESS.—The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Con-

8

gress’’ means—

9

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the

10

Committee on Homeland Security and Govern-

11

mental Affairs, the Committee on the Judiciary,

12

and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the

13

Senate; and

14

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the

15

Committee on Homeland Security, the Com-

16

mittee on the Judiciary, and the Permanent Se-

17

lect Committee on Intelligence of the House of

18

Representatives.

19

(4) ARTICLEIII COURT.—The term ‘‘Article III

20

court’’ means a court of the United States estab-

21

lished under Article III of the Constitution of the

22

United States.

23

(5) COALITIONPARTNER.—The term ‘‘coalition

24

partner’’, with respect to hostilities engaged in by

25

March 4, 2010 (12:06 p.m.)

11

ARM10090 S.L.C.

the United States, means any State or armed force

1

directly engaged along with the United States in

2

such hostilities or providing direct operational sup-

3

port to the United States in connection with such

4

hostilities.

5

(6) GENEVA CONVENTION RELATIVE TO THE

6

TREATMENT OF PRISONERS OF WAR.—The term

7

‘‘Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of

8

Prisoners of War’’ means the Geneva Convention

9

Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, done

10

at Geneva August 12, 1949 (6 UST 3316).

11

(7) HOSTILITIES.—The term ‘‘hostilities’’

12

means any conflict subject to the laws of war, and

13

includes a deliberate attack upon civilians and civil-

14

ian targets protected by the laws of war.

15

(8) PRIVILEGED BELLIGERENT.—The term

16

‘‘privileged belligerent’’ means an individual belong-

17

ing to one of the eight categories enumerated in Ar-

18

ticle 4 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the

19

Treatment of Prisoners of War.

20

(9) UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY BELLIGERENT.—

21

The term ‘‘unprivileged enemy belligerent’’ means an

22

individual (other than a privileged belligerent) who—

23

(A) has engaged in hostilities against the

24

United States or its coalition partners;

25

March 4, 2010 (12:06 p.m.)

12

ARM10090 S.L.C.

(B) has purposely and materially sup-

1

ported hostilities against the United States or

2

its coalition partners; or

3

(C) was a part of al Qaeda at the time of

4

capture.

5

SEC. 7. EFFECTIVE DATE.

6

This Act shall take effect on the date of the enact-

7

ment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to individ-

8

uals who are captured or otherwise come into the custody

9

or under the effective control of the United States on or

10

after that date.

11

March 4, 2010 (12:06 p.m.)