Showing posts with label Nevada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nevada. Show all posts

Thursday, May 6, 2010

DMV stops issuing Real ID licenses



DMV stops issuing Real ID licenses

CARSON CITY -- High security driver's licenses won't be issued by the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles for now or anytime in the near future.

A proposed DMV regulation to give citizens the option of securing the Real ID-compliant driver's licenses was not placed on the agenda of Friday's Legislative Commission, a spokesman said Wednesday.






That leaves the agency with no authority to issue these licenses, which it calls Advance Secure Issuance licenses. Citizens needed to show extra identification before being issued the new licenses.

A temporary regulation issued by Gov. Jim Gibbons that allowed the new licenses expired on April 30.

In the first four months of the year, 46,000 Nevadans had secured the Real ID licenses, including 21,000 who were not required to under the regulation.

"Everything we do is in the Nevada Revised Statutes or in regulation," said Tom Jacobs, a DMV spokesman. "Both are approved by the Legislature. We can't move forward without legislative approval."

Gibbons had issued the 120-day regulation, despite the fact the 2009 Legislature did not pass a bill to allow the DMV to issue Real ID licenses and a legislative committee in November declined to act on regulations to let the agency move forward with the licenses.

The DMV spent $2 million, including $750,000 in state funds, to set up systems and prepare staff for the new licenses.

reda on http://www.lvrj.com/news/dmv-stops-issuing-real-id-licenses-92888344.html

Monday, April 19, 2010

'Terrorist attack' on Las Vegas canceled: Politics over preparedness?

'Terrorist attack' on Las Vegas canceled: Politics over preparedness?

At Sen. Harry Reid's request, the Obama administration canceled a mock 'dirty bomb' terrorist attack exercise in Las Vegas. Critics say the administration is playing politics with national preparedness, but others say a shift to secret surprise tests is a better way to prepare for the worst.

Aladdin and Paris Casinos on the "The Strip" in Las Vegas. Plans for an emergency preparedness exercise there involving a mock 'dirty bomb' have been canceled.

Newscom

Enlarge

BJonsson, Staff writer / March 30, 2010

One thing is definite about this year's federal play-acting exercise to assess national emergency preparedness: A faux radioactive nuke, or "dirty bomb," will not be blowing up the Las Vegas Strip in May.

Skip to next paragraph

Reminiscent of Stephen King's "The Stand" featuring a similar cataclysmic showdown in Vegas, the preparedness exercise proved too much for many Nevadans, already battered by a poor economy and worried about a PR nightmare.

Sen. Harry Reid (D) of Nevada, in the midst of battling for the White House's healthcare reforms, wrote late last year that to "simulate a nuclear detonation in the heart of the city would unacceptably harm the Southern Nevadan economy."

More recently, President Obama had rankled Nevadans when he suggested that gambling on the Vegas Strip wasn’t the wisest move “when you’re trying to save for college." When Senator Reid complained about the comment, Mr. Obama was quick to apologize.

read on http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0330/Terrorist-attack-on-Las-Vegas-canceled-Politics-over-preparedness

Friday, March 12, 2010

Las Vegas jobless rate hits all-time high of 13.1 percent

Las Vegas jobless rate hits all-time high of 13.1 percent


Nevada's unemployment rose to 12.5 percent in July, while joblessness in especially hard-hit Las Vegas surged to 13.1 percent. It’s the highest jobless rate both statewide and locally since the state began tracking data in 1976.

FULL STORY BELOW

No “green shoots” for Nevada.

As economists and policymakers nationwide hover over the tender little economic tendrils that herald recovery from recession, Nevada’s economy looks as barren as the Mojave Desert.

As a trickle of data points to the national downturn’s end, Nevada’s economy continues its descent. Joblessness in the Silver State jumped to 12.5 percent in July, while unemployment in hard-hit Las Vegas leapt to 13.1 percent. Both state and local unemployment scored their highest levels in 33 years of tracking, the state Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation said today.

Nevada’s jobless rate was more than double its level in July 2008, when 6.6 percent of the state’s residents were out of work. In Las Vegas, unemployment was at 6.8 percent in July 2008.

Bill Anderson, chief economist with the employment department, said Nevada remains stuck in the longest, deepest recession since World War II, and recent labor-market trends don’t signal any improvement.

Joblessness in Nevada jumped 1.9 percentage points from April to June, the biggest three-month spike on record. Nevada shed nearly 28,000 jobs in the three-month period, including 15,000 jobs from June to July alone. Nationally, unemployment has moderated, declining from 9.5 percent to 9.4 percent between June and July.

In all, 179,300 Nevadans are unemployed and actively seeking work.

“It shows just how weak the economy is, that even this late in the recession, we’re still losing so many jobs,” said Jered McDonald, an economist with the employment department.

Nevada has the nation’s third-highest unemployment rate. The Silver State trails only Michigan, with 15 percent joblessness, and Rhode Island, where unemployment is at 12.7 percent. Las Vegas has born the brunt of the state’s hard times.

The city recorded the highest jobless rate of any of Nevada’s statistical areas, and it also ranks among the top five markets of its size nationwide for unemployment. Las Vegas lost 11,900 jobs from June to July, and 60,000 jobs year-over-year in July. The employment department blamed the job cuts on cutbacks in local government, slumping convention business and a sustained drop in construction activity.

Las Vegas also hurts more today because it enjoyed an especially vibrant boom era, said Jeremy Aguero, a principal in local research firm Applied Analysis. The city grew more than most other markets in the 1990s and early 2000s.

But that expansion came largely from unsustainble levels of consumer spending, Aguero noted, and it relied on a high concentration of workers in the volatile construction sector.

Plus, Las Vegas feels the downturn more than other areas of Nevada because it’s less diverse, McDonald said. For example, Reno (12.1 percent unemployed) and Carson City (11.7 percent jobless) house more manufacturers, distribution centers, high-tech companies and professional and business services than Las Vegas has, and mining protects the state’s rural areas from the slump. Unemployment is just 6.7 percent in in Elko County, where high gold prices allow businesses to put the labor force to work.

As high as unemployment is, the broader picture is even bleaker, said Keith Schwer, director of the Center for Business and Economic Research at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas.

The employment department’s published jobless rate doesn’t include discouraged workers who’ve stopped hunting for jobs, and it doesn’t count underemployed Nevadans who’d like to work full-time but can find only part-time jobs.

If you factor in the discouraged and the underemployed, Nevada had a 12-month average of 15.2 percent joblessness in the second quarter. McDonald said he suspects the rate is even higher now — perhaps nearly double the stated unemployment rate, and certainly close to 20 percent.

Aguero sees underemployment written all over the latest figures that gauge hours on the job. The average number of hours worked by all private-sector employees in Nevada was 35.8 hours a week in June. That’s down from 37.5 hours in June 2007. Average weekly earnings also dropped, falling from $739 in June 2008 to $706 a year later.

“This other layer of unemployment is pretty problematic for us,” Aguero said. “It says there’s substantial compression being pushed down on the average worker, and their ability to earn is much lower. But more important than that, there’s a general belief that both hours and wages will have to rebound before unemployment rebounds. These numbers are a greater signal on whether the economy is showing signs of improvement.”

Even the basic statewide unemployment stats show few signs of improvement. Just two of Nevada’s major employment categories grew year-over-year in July. Mining added 100 jobs, for growth of 0.8 percent, while the combined category of health and education services gained 2,200 positions, or 2.3 percent.

Construction lost 32,200 jobs, or 25.7 percent of its work force. Manufacturing employment shrank by 3,800 positions, or 7.8 percent. Leisure and hospitality companies cut 22,700 jobs, or 6.8 percent of their industry’s work force. The banking field was down 4,200 jobs, or 6.8 percent, while professional and business services such as law firms, accounting businesses and engineering companies slashed 10,700 jobs, or 7.1 percent of the sector’s work force. Governments statewide cut 4,400 jobs, or 2.9 percent of their total work force.

There’s also no indication that the labor pool is shrinking from outmigration or any other cause. The state’s work force expanded 2 percent from June to July, growing by 28,000 people to 1.41 million workers. The local labor force grew 2.3 percent, or 23,200 people, to just more than 1 million. A bigger work force could contribute to gains in unemployment, while a smaller work force could curb jobless levels.

Contact reporter Jennifer Robison at jrobison@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-4512.

http://www.lvrj.com/news/breaking_news/53936227.html

Monday, March 8, 2010

Election 2010: Nevada Senate

Election 2010: Nevada Senate
Nevada Senate: Two GOP Hopefuls Take Longer Lead on Reid

Two of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s Republican challengers have again crossed the 50% threshold and now hold double-digit leads in Nevada’s U.S. Senate race. One big hurdle for the incumbent is that most Nevada voters are strongly opposed to the health care legislation championed by Reid and President Barack Obama.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely voters in the state finds Sue Lowden, ex-chairman of the Nevada Republican Party, with a 51% to 38% lead on Reid. Seven percent (7%) prefer some other candidate, but just three percent (3%) are undecided.

Businessman Danny Tarkanian posts a similar 50% to 37% lead over the embattled Democratic leader. Nine percent (9%) opt for another candidate, and four percent (4%) are undecided.

Last month, Reid earned 39% of the vote against both Republicans, while Lowden picked up 45% and Tarkanian 47% in their respective match-ups with him.

Tarkanian hit 50% in January, and both he and Lowden posted that level of supportlast September.

Last fall Reid’s support was in the 40s. Since then, it’s been trending down into the 30s, suggesting that the Senate race continues to be a referendum on Reid rather than a show of support for his GOP opponents.

Former Assemblywoman Sharron Angle, continues to run weakest of the three top Republican hopefuls, but this month she leads Reid 46% to 38%. In January, she had a 44% to 40% lead.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

Forty-five percent (45%) have a favorable view of the so-called Tea Party movement. Thirty percent (30%) view it unfavorably, and 25% are not sure what they think.

Only 23% of the state’s voters consider themselves part of the Tea Party movement.

Any incumbent who is earning less than 50% at this stage of a campaign is considered potentially vulnerable. Reid, who is seeking a fifth term in the Senate, received 61% of the vote in 2004.

Forty-one percent (41%) of Nevada voters support the health care plan championed by Reid and now working its way through Congress. Fifty-six percent (56%) oppose it, which is slightly higher than opposition nationally.

More significantly for Reid, those figures include just 24% who Strongly Favor the plan and 51% who are strongly opposed. Those who strongly favor the plan overwhelmingly support Reid, while those who strongly oppose it overwhelmingly support the Republicans.

Sixty-five percent (65%) of Nevada voters also think it would be better for the country if most incumbents were not reelected to Congress this November. Only 32% say their local congressional representative deserves reelection.

Twenty percent (20%) of voters in the state have a very favorable opinion of Reid, while 48% view him very unfavorably.

For Lowden, very favorables are 18%, and very unfavorables total 12%.

Tarkanian is viewed very favorably by 15% and very unfavorably by eight percent (8%).

Nine percent (9%) have a very unfavorable view of Angle, and the same number (9%) see her very unfavorably.

At this point in a campaign, Rasmussen Reports considers the number of people with a strong opinion more significant than the total favorable/unfavorable numbers.

While Barack Obama carried Nevada with 55% of the vote in 2008, just 44% of voters in the state now approve of the job he is doing as president, marking little change from last month. Fifty-seven percent (57%) disapprove of the president’s performance. These findings include 27% who strongly approve and 47% who strongly disapprove. This is comparable to Obama's approval ratings in the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll.

Thirty-six percent (36%) say the president has done a good or excellent job handling the health care issue, but 54% rate his performance in this area as poor.

While the president pushes to get his health care plan back on track, 60% of Nevada voters say the better strategy would be to pass smaller bills that address problems individually rather than a comprehensive bill like the one now before Congress. Just 29% see a comprehensive bill as a better move.

When it comes to health care decisions, 51% fear the federal government more than private insurance companies. Forty-four percent (44%) fear private insurers more. Those figures are similar to the national average.

Thirty-three percent (33%) in Nevada expect the economy to be stronger in a year’s time, but 41% think it will be weaker. Again, the views of Nevada voters are similar to the views of Americans nationally. Just 23% say it’s possible for anyone who really wants to work to find a job these days. Fifty-six percent (56%) disagree.

Forty-five percent (45%) have a favorable view of the so-called Tea Party movement. Thirty percent (30%) view it unfavorably, and 25% are not sure what they think.

Only 23% of the state’s voters consider themselves part of the Tea Party movement.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/nevada/election_2010_nevada_senate

Election 2010: Nevada Governor

Election 2010: Nevada Governor
Nevada Governor: Rory Reid Now
Trails Two GOP Hopefuls

Republican frontrunner Brain Sandoval now has an 18-point lead over

Democrat Rory Reid in Nevada’s gubernatorial race.

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Nevada voters finds Reid, son of Senator Harry Reid, trailing Sandoval 53% to 35%. Seven percent (7%) prefer another candidate, while five percent (5%) are undecided.

Sandoval, a former Nevada attorney general and ex-U.S. District Court Judge, led Reid by 12 points - 45% to 33% - in Rasmussen Reports’ first look at the contest early last month.

Another GOP hopeful, North Las Vegas Mayor Mike Montandon, posts a 42% to 37% lead over Reid. In the previous survey, Reid led Montandon 40% to 36%. Thirteen percent (13%) like some other candidate, and eight percent (8%) are undecided.

But Reid still leads the state's unpopular incumbent Republican Governor Jim Gibbons, 44% to 36%, marking virtually no change from a month ago. Fifteen percent (15%) opt for someone else. Only four percent (4%) are undecided.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

Reid’s father continues to face a difficult Senate reelection this year, due largely to his parties championing of an unpopular health care bill and a weakening state economy. Two of his Republican challengers have again crossed the 50% threshold and now hold double-digit leads in Nevada’s U.S. Senate race.

Nevada Republicans will pick their Senate and gubernatorial nominees in a June 8 primary.

Male voters prefer all three Republicans over Reid but by just three points when Gibbons is the candidate. Sandoval leads among female voters, too, but Reid has the edge among women over Gibbons and Montandon.

Among voters not affiliated with either major party in the state, Reid trails Sandoval but leads both Gibbons and Montandon.

Thirty-seven percent (37%) of all voters in Nevada at least somewhat approve of the job Gibbons has been doing as governor, including just nine percent (9%) who strongly approve. That’s down slightly from February and December.

Sixty-one percent (61%) disapprove of the governor’s performance, including 37% who strongly disapprove.

Just 12% of Nevada voters share a very favorable opinion of their governor, while 36% view him very unfavorably.

Sandoval earns very favorable views from 17% and very unfavorable marks from 10%.

Reid, chairman of the influential Clark County Board of Commissioners, is viewed very favorably by 15%, but 34% view him very unfavorably.

Only five percent (5%) share a very favorable opinion of Montandon and eight percent (8%) view him very unfavorably. Montandon is by far the least known of the four candidates.

At this point in a campaign, Rasmussen Reports considers the number of people with a strong opinion more significant than the total favorable/unfavorable numbers.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_governor_elections/nevada/election_2010_nevada_governor

Sunday, March 7, 2010

Brace for massive food recall: officials

Brace for massive food recall: officials

Common flavouring may be contaminated with salmonella; some chips, dips pulled in Canada

Canadian consumers can likely expect an avalanche of food recalls after an ingredient used in thousands of processed foods was found to be contaminated with salmonella, government investigators said Friday.

The popular flavour enhancer hydrolyzed vegetable protein (HVP) is added to a wide range of processed foods, including dips, salad dressings, chips, sauces, hotdogs, soups and frozen dinners.

Already, 56 products in the United States and two in Canada -- Hawaiian Kettle Style Sweet Maui Onion potato chips and T. Marzetti brand veggie dips -- have been recalled this week after salmonella was detected in the flavouring ingredient produced by a Nevada company.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency said Friday the recall net will probably widen as it continues to work with the Canadian clients of Basic Food Flavors, Inc. and importers of processed foods containing the ingredient.

Confronting a complicated and long supply chain, the Food and Drug Administration in the U.S. said this could result in one of the largest food recalls in North America.

"It has the potential, but we don't know," spokeswoman Rita Chappelle said.

In this case, Basic Food Flavors, based in Las Vegas, is one of a handful of companies that supplies hydrolyzed vegetable protein to foodmakers.

The additive, which comes as a powder or paste, is often blended with other spices to make seasonings that are used in or on foods to give them a meaty or savoury flavour.

A customer of the supplier identified a problem last month, when it found salmonella in supplies shipped from Basic Food Flavors. The FDA then inspected the processing plant and identified salmonella in the processing equipment.

All HVP manufactured since last September is caught up in the recall -- meaning millions of kilograms of a potentially contaminated additive were distributed in bulk to foodmakers over a five-month period.

To date, there have been no reported illnesses associated with the consumption of the recalled products, U.S. and Canadian authorities said.

Chappelle said the health risk is "very low" for a whole swath of products the ingredient is added to -- namely cooked processed foods -- because they "have a step in food processing which would effectively kill the salmonella. However, the risk would be to ready-to-eat food," she said, citing potato chips, dips and salad dressing as examples.

"You would just pop open a bag of potato chips and eat them."

CFIA spokesman

said Friday that since salmonella is destroyed when food is cooked to

a safe internal temperature, the agency is working with the FDA to determine which products contain the potentially contaminated ingredient, but do not include a step that would kill salmonella.

These are subject to recall, said Gravelle.

Food contaminated with salmonella may not look or smell spoiled, but consuming it may cause salmonellosis, a food-borne illness.

In young children, the elderly and people with weakened immune systems, salmonellosis may cause serious and sometimes deadly infections. In otherwise healthy people, it may cause short-term symptoms, such as high fever, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea.

For more information on the chips and vegetable dips that have been recalled in Canada, check the What's New section of CFIA's website:www.inspection.gc.ca.


Saturday, March 14, 2009

Geoff Schumacher of Review Journal says Poisoning water is Good


SHILL
Geoff Schumacher
Geoff Schumacher the shill that says, since
the government thinks poison is good for us then
we should just all slurp down toxins. If
you, for some reason think that ingesting
a know cancer causing agent that is proven
to weaken your bones and your immune
system, that you must be a quack. Well i
am not a quack. These
chemicals are known to dumb you
down. Maybe Geoff is a victim of this mass dumbing down.
The comments below are
enough to discredit you.

Fluoride conspiracists need to locate reality, go there

I don’t want to freak you out, but there is fluoride in Clark County’s water. It’s in there because it’s a proven measure to reduce tooth decay in children. It’s working, and nothing strange is happening to those of us who ingest the tap water.

But the rest of the state, including the Reno-Sparks area, goes without, largely because of conspiracy theories that fluoride is some sort of government plot to poison people.

Unlike those who believe the military is hiding a crashed UFO at Area 51, or those who believe the government has implanted tiny listening devices under their skin, the fluoride conspiracists are actually harming the public. They testified Monday at the Nevada Legislature against a bill to add fluoride to the water in Washoe County. A doctor, of all people, testified that fluoride is an industrial waste product and causes all kinds of terrible diseases. If I were to hazard a guess, I’d say the bill is not likely to pass because of these kooks.

As a result, kids in the Reno-Sparks area will experience higher rates of tooth decay, and thus higher dental bills. Former Assemblywoman Chris Giunchigliani, who got the bill passed in 2001 to add fluoride to Las Vegas water, didn’t mince words in response to the conspiracy theorists speaking out at the Legislature. She told the Las Vegas Sun, “It says we’re very backward.”

Yep.

Here are some comments from the site:

Over 2,300 professionals urge the US Congress to stop water fluoridation until Congressional hearings are conducted, citing scientific evidence that fluoridation, long promoted to fight tooth decay, is ineffective and has serious health risks. See statement: http://www.fluorideaction.org/statement.august.2007.html.

Also, eleven Environmental Protection Agency employee unions representing over 7000 environmental and public health professionals called for a moratorium on drinking water fluoridation programs across the country, and have asked EPA management to recognize fluoride as posing a serious risk of causing cancer in people.

Last election day, 53 US cities rejected fluoridation joining a growing list of communities saying "No," to fluoridation.

Adverse Health Effects of Fluoride:
http://www.FluorideAction.Net/health

Fluoridation 101
http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof

"The National Kidney Foundation dropped its fluoridation support replacing it with this caution: “Individuals with CKD [Chronic Kidney Disease] should be notified of the potential risk of fluoride exposure.”

Scientific American editors wrote in January 2008, "Some recent studies suggest that over-consumption of fluoride can raise the risks of disorders affecting teeth, bones, the brain and the thyroid gland"

Nobel Prize winner in medicine, Dr. Arvid Carlsson, says, “Fluoridation is against all principles of modern pharmacology. It's really obsolete.”

An Online Action Petition to Congress in support of the Professionals' Statement is available on FAN's web site, http://congress.fluorideaction.net and over 19,000 individuals have signed so far."

Written by: nyscof on Wednesday, Apr. 08, 2009 at 4:34 AM -

"What an idiot this Schumacher guy is. I think he's been "dumbed down" by all the fluoride in his drinking water! If he wants to live in denial, that's fine with me."

Written by: AJ on Wednesday, Apr. 08, 2009 at 2:04 PM

"Yeah the Nazi's thought fluoride in the water was a great idea too. You want fluoride, go and buy it. It's in toothpaste in case you didn't know and you aren't supposed to swallow it cause it is poison. 3 to 5 grams will kill an adult and a tube of crest will kill an infant or even child if swallowed but you want it in the water so everytime you have a drink you ingest it? Your ignorance is truly a reckless hazard to the entire community. I don't want poison in my water but if you want it go and buy it for yourself you ignoramous!"

Written by: Gerv on Wednesday, Aug. 19, 2009 at 12:14 AM -

"This is not journalism , it's propaganda. As someone else already said ,if you want fluoride for dental reasons then use the toothpaste! Mr.Schumacher you really should do some research before you write more piffle.Drinking water should NEVER be fluoridated in a sane society. Vested interest perhaps, Geoff?"

Written by: Mick H on Wednesday, Mar. 10, 2010 at 3:30 AM

http://www.lvrj.com/blogs/schumacher/Fluoride_conspiracists_need_to_locate_reality.html




Friday, March 14, 2008

The government says it’s good, so Nevadans say no to fluoride

The government says it’s good, so Nevadans say no to fluoride

Tuesday, April 7, 2009 | 2 a.m.

— Unless it’s the gold standard, few issues draw out the hard-core libertarians like the issue of fluoride in the water.

And Nevada, particularly the older and more settled northern part, has a strong contingent of those individuals who tend to liberally connect the dots on issues.

So the hearing room for testimony on Senate Bill 311, which would require the fluoridation of water in Washoe County, filled up quickly Monday.

The story goes back to 1999, when the Legislature introduced a bill that required fluoridation of water. Then-Assemblywoman Chris Giunchigliani (now a Clark County commissioner) recalls the John Birch Society coming after her and people leaving messages accusing her of trying to poison them.

“It was not pleasant,” Giunchigliani testified Monday.

To get the bill passed, she changed it to require only Clark County to add fluoride. That was done starting in 2001.

Clinging to a persistent mistrust of the natural mineral, the rest of the state has not gone to fluoride.

In 2002, 58 percent of Washoe County voters said no to fluoride.

Monday’s testimony before the Senate Committee on Health and Education began with graphic pictures showing the effect of refusal to fluoridate.

Mark Rosenberg, a former U.S. Public Health Service dental director, now with St. Mary’s Hospital in Reno, offered slides of children’s decaying teeth. He came armed with statistics — 60 percent of the U.S. population lives in an area with fluoridated water. These areas have 30 percent less childhood decay than nonfluoridated areas; Washoe County children in the Headstart program had 15 percent more cavities than Las Vegas Headstart children. (It should be noted that this is one of the rare areas in which Clark County ranks better than the rest of the state.)

Rosenberg talked about baby root canals.

“It’s important to protect the dental health of the population, particularly children,” testified Sen. Bernice Matthews, D-Reno, the bill’s sponsor.

Senators knew opposition was coming, though. Near the front of the audience sat mothers of a certain age, good posture and primly dressed, clutching Internet printouts.

Sen. Dennis Nolan, R-Las Vegas, asked dentist Tyree Davis if he has seen any negative effect of fluoridation.

“I’ve never heard of anyone growing a third eye, or anything like that,” he joked. Not getting much of a laugh, he got more serious. “Certainly no problems I’ve heard of.”

Then the opposition began testifying.

Michael Gerber, a Reno homeopathic doctor, said fluoride is actually an industrial waste product that U.S. industries favor putting in drinking water supplies as a way to dispose of it. He also claimed fluoride has been associated with osteoporosis, bone cancer, Alzheimer’s and dementia.

Nolan, however, noted that two or three generations have grown up with fluoride in their water. “There haven’t been any deformities that I’ve heard of,” Nolan said.

Janine Hansen, head of the libertarian group Nevada Eagle Forum and president of the Independent American Party, testified about the dangers of fluoride, saying they include a risk of suicide. “Brain function is vulnerable to fluoride,” she said. “This is about civil liberties, medicating people through their water,” she said.

And thus the crux of the issue — this is government ordering you to ingest something even if you don’t want it.

Assemblyman Bernie Anderson, D-Sparks, agreed that there was something particularly Nevada about the opposition to fluoridation.

“There’s a distrust of anything that the government says is good,” he said. “Why are you a better guardian of my health than I am? It’s reflexive.”

Still, Anderson, a native Nevadan, compared it to immunizations that helped eliminate diseases such as smallpox.

Giunchigliani, asked about the opposition after the hearing, had a different take.

“It says we’re very backward,” she said.

The dentists and public health advocates made their earnest arguments.

Rosenberg seemed confounded by the opposition.

“I don’t understand what they’re thinking,” he said. He noted that no fluoride in the water increases customers for the dentists. “Maybe it’s the dental association funding all this opposition.”