Protesters Beat Down Riot Police

Protests turn violent as opposition rallies in Kyrgyzstan

Edited 08 April, 2010, 03:23Published 07 April, 2010, 17:06

A state of emergency has been imposed in the capital and several regions of Kyrgyzstan amid violent clashes between police and anti-government demonstrators.

The president of the Kyrgyz republic has ordered a curfew be imposed.47 people have been killed and 400 wounded in Bishkek, reports KABAR news agency, citing the Kyrgyz Health Ministry, after police opened fire on crowds massing around the main government building.

The Kyrgyz Border Service has strengthened security along all borders of the country.

The demonstrators are demanding the current authorities step down.

Earlier KABAR news agency reported that protesters had seized the building of National Security Service and freed those detained.

However, security services have dismissed this claim.

The Prosecutor-General’s Office in Bishkek has been burnt down. The building is very near to the central square of Bishkek.

Houses belonging to the Kyrgyz President’s family in Bishkek are on fire, according to witnesses, Interfax news agency reports. A group of marauders started to rob these houses before they were set on fire. There are unconfirmed reports that the local art museum has also been robbed.

Opposition members have broken into the Kyrgyz Parliament building, reports RIA Novosti. An opposition member and vice-speaker of Kyrgyz parliament, Omurbek Tekerbaev, earlier detained by authorities and then freed, is among them. Some of the protesters are stopping looters and preventing the building from being pillaged.

RIA Novosti

Several more opposition leaders have been released by officials. Currently they are discussing the possibility of dialogue with the authorities.

The head of the presidential staff of the country denied reports that Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiev has fled the country.

The bulk of the protesters have now been dispersed in the central part of the city of Bishkek, according to Intefax. But the demonstrators are still attempting to storm the main government buidling.

“The main demand is the resignation of President Bakiev, who is accused of nepotism, raising energy prices, and illegally selling a hydro-electric station. People are demanding an early election,”Shamil Murat, a Kyrgyz opposition activist from Talas, told RT.

Police are using tear gas and concussion grenades in an effort to disperse thousands of people gathered in front of the government building in Bishkek.

Kubat Otorbaev, a local journalist from Bishkek and bureau chief of Azattyk-Media, told RT that: “Special police forces and the president’s guards are protecting [the building]. Transport in the city is paralyzed, banks are not working. Many schools have been forced to stop classes.”

There has been information that state broadcasting has been interrupted because the TV-station has been seized by supporters of the opposition.

“We can confirm that the national TV and radio broadcasting corporation was captured by the opposition,” told RT an eyewitness, Bektur Iskender, editor-in-chief of www.kloop.kg. “Several people already told me that…some human rights organizations and opposition have already started broadcasting live talk-shows on this TV channel and also at the LTR, which is the public broadcasting channel. But all the other channels are reportedly not broadcasting.”

Listen to full interview with Bektur Iskender

Similar events are taking place in other regions of the country.

News agencies report that several local government buildings have already been seized.
Kubat Otorbaev confirms this information: “In the Naryn region, people have seized the regional administration building and elected their own governor. Yesterday in Talas, people seized the administration building and the governor reportedly had to resign. And just moments ago, people seized the police headquarters of the Talas region. Police in Bishkek and Talas are using tear gas and rubber bullets. There about 50 wounded in the Talas regional hospital.”

Listen to the phone interview with Kubat Otorbaev

At the same time, Fergana.ru repots that in the regional center of Talas, experiencing clashes for the second day, chaos now reigns. The protesters have seized the local governor, deputy prime minister and the interior minister.

And according to some troubling reports, the supporters of Kurmanbek Bakiyev are now being given out arms.

The Former Defense Minister of Kyrgyzstan says the country’s President is gathering forces and carrying out some provocations in the south of the country, perhaps to be able to gain enough support to be able to counter the opposition which gained control over the capital Bishkek.

Further there are speculations that the opposition forces in Bishkek are also giving out arms to their supporters.

The army and police remain neutral as they haven’t supported either side.

Omurbek Tekebayev, one of the leaders of the Kyrgyz opposition party 'Ata-Maken', explained to RT what their next moves are likely to be.

“The opposition is in talks with the government, demanding it steps down. They gave a preliminary agreement, but it hasn’t been confirmed yet. The disorder in the capital is getting worse. The Interior Ministry is not under the control of the opposition's temporary government, nor the old one, and it isn’t doing anything,” according to Tekebayev.

“This situation will soon be resolved and the opposition government will have its first session, with all members present,” Tekebayev said.

Omurbek Tekebayev has also said the roots of the unrest lie in the US role in the country.

"Today, I blame the Americans for their double standards – when they see all this and close their eyes to it. They criticize other nations while here they support the regime. And we believe that it could be due to the fact that Bakiyev is letting them fully restore the American military base and agrees to give them more land."

Calls for a major political reshuffle

Dissatisfied with the country’s leadership, the protestors are calling for a major political reshuffle, including the resignation of the country’s leader, Kurmanbek Bakiyev.

Gennady Chufrin from the World Economy Institute says Kyrgyz President may have no choice but to give up power.

The incumbent president of Kyrgyzstan, came to power in 2005 as a result of the so-called Tulip Revolution.

"These events only resemble the 2005 Tulip Revolution in external signs and causes.The reasons for the current disturbances are significant corruption, the economic troubles of the Kyrgyz people, and because President Bakiyev’s clan occupies all the leading posts in the country. He is not Akayev, his predecessor, and he won't give up his power as easily. Blood is going to be spilled,” Professor Sergey Lusyanin, from the Russian Academy of Sciences, told RT.

Kyrgyzstan fact-box

• Kyrgyzstan, or the Kyrgyz Republic, is a country in Central Asia with a population of about 5, 5 million people. The capital is Bishkek. A former Soviet Republic, it gained independence in 1991.
• The Tulip Revolution refers to the overthrow of the Republic’s President, Askar Akayev, in 2005. The upheaval was caused by the popular dissatisfaction with the regime, which was thought to be corrupt and authoritarian. The term Tulip was coined by Akayev himself when he used the word in a speech, saying no colour revolution should take place in Kyrgyzstan.
• Talas is a small town in northwestern Kyrgyzstan with a population of about 30,000 people.

An expert on Central Asia, Asher CJ Pirt, says the running of the 2009 presidential election is to blame for the discontent.

“The elections were, in many eyes, stolen by the authorities. There were a lot of irregularities and this is a great concern to the local population. Bakiyev didn’t really seem to allow the proper electoral process to go on. And of course he doesn’t have the legitimacy that he needs to run the country,”he said.

Lilit Gevorgyan, a political analyst from IHS Global Insight, a leading financial and market research company, believes the protests were triggered by the court decision to ban opposition newspapers as well as TV outlets.

“I think that was the last straw that prompted the opposition to take its protest onto the streets, but the undoing of Bakiyev’s government had been coming for many months now. I would say that his decision in October to centralize, even further, his power, putting most important ministries under his control, started the process,” she said.

Among the causes for the unrest are the alleged attempts on the part of the ruling party to prevent opposition meetings across the country scheduled for April 7. The steps taken included the detention of opposition leaders.

The demonstration began in Talas on Tuesday. Earlier, opposition leaders has made some demands to the authorities. In particular, they demanded changes to the country’s constitution and the resignation of some high-ranking officials. Otherwise the opposition leaders promised to organize mass clashes on the next day, April 7.

The cause of the popular unrest was the detention of one of the opposition activists on Tuesday, April 6.

About 1000 people gathered at the local interior department, demanding Bolot Sherniyazov’s freedom. The opposition claimed that, after the demand, he was released under opposition pressure. But the local interior department professed that Sherniyazov had not been detained, but merely invited to the officials to discuss impermissibility of certain unauthorized actions. Since that time, there have been some more reports of the detention of opposition leaders, according to human rights organizations.

On Wednesday, April 7, popular unrest spread to Bishkek. Opposition leaders gathered by the headquarters of the Kyrgyz opposition Social-Democratic party, leading to clashes with police.

Kyrgyz Prime Minister Daniyar Usenov has called current events in the country a crime against the state. According to his information, during the clashes in Talas, 85 policemen were wounded, including 19 who were hospitalized, with five of them in critical condition.

The current unrest was planned, claims the Kyrgyz prime minister.“Events in Talas were organized in advance and aimed at taking power,” he said. Similar disturbances were also planned in other regions of the country, Daniyar Usenov added.

Meanwhile, Edil Baisalov, the opposition member, told RT that the authorities are abusing their power to crack down on the opposition.

“Today they literally turned off access to the Internet,” Edil said.“They turned off the leading blogs”.

“They understand that this is the final battle and they are using all their means”, Baisalov concluded.

Kirill Koktysh, a political analyst, thinks if the conflict ended with a change of power, “the next regime would pretend to be sort of different from Bakiev’s one.”

“That means if Bakiev’s regime pretend to be more secular one, the next regime would pretend to be more Muslim,” he added.

Watch full interview with Kirill Koktysh

Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention and Prosecution Act of 2010

Panic Legislation: The Wrong Response

JURIST Guest Columnist Amos Guiora of the University of Utah College of Law says that the McCain-Lieberman military detention bill recently introduced in the Senate is yet another unfortunate instance of US national security legislation being driven by panic instead of principle.....

---

The "Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention and Prosecution Act of 2010," introduced last Thursday by Senator John McCain and Senator Joseph Lieberman, is but the latest example of panic-based legislation. As the debate over where to try terrorists intensifies in the wake of the attempted Detroit airplane bombing and the Obama Administration’s announcement that it is going to reconsider its decision to try those responsible for 9/11 in federal court, it is clear that panic is once more driving policy.

The proposed bill mandates that any person detained on suspicion of terrorist acts or material support for terrorism be placed in military custody. The detainee will not be entitled to Miranda rights and will remain in detention – and can be interrogated – while the Executive Branch makes a status determination. If determined to be an unprivileged enemy belligerent, the detainee will be held until the end of hostilities. Needless to say, unlike the POW in the war paradigm, for detainees, end of hostilities in the terrorism paradigm is a euphemism for ‘indefinite detention’.

The legislation’s panic response can be seen not only in the due process and rights denied, but in the categories of persons it addresses. By encompassing those suspected of material support for terrorism – a federal crime indeed but never part of the law of war – the bill subjects an extraordinarily broad group of persons to indefinite detention.

The proposed legislation’s impact would be a fundamental miscarriage of justice created by the unconstitutional denial of the right to counsel, the right to remain silent, the right to be free from arbitrary, let alone indefinite detention, and the right to a day in court.

Past practice in the US and abroad demonstrates, unfortunately, that panic and the desire to respond plays a dominant role over legitimate national security interests, respect for constitutional and international law considerations and careful analysis of the threat posed. That is, the response becomes what is important; its legitimacy and justification take a back seat. While terrorism poses a threat, that threat does not justify throwing our principles out the door in panic.

After the December 13, 2001 attack on the Indian parliament, the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) created an overly broad definition of terrorism, and provided for detention of suspects for up to three months without charge. On September 17, 2004, the new elected Indian government of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh announced that it would honor its election pledge to repeal the POTA, which dispensed with the presumption of innocence, allowed the compulsory denial of bail, and enabled the admissibility of confessions despite the rampant use of torture and coercion by police and security forces.

In the aftermath of the Passover eve bombing in Netanya, Israel, considered one of the worst terrorist attack in the nation’s history, Israel extended the time for detention of Palestinians suspected of involvement in terrorism to 18 days without judicial review. In striking down the law, the High Court of Justice made two key observations. First, the legislation was a classic example of a short-term response that did not address the long-term impact or issues of morality and legality. Second, democracies must adopt self-imposed restraints, recognizing that they must fight terrorism with “one arm behind their backs.”

Republicans and Democrats alike have failed to articulate, create and implement a lawful interrogation, detention and trial regime for post-9/11 detainees. That is shameful and reflects negatively on two Presidents, the Congress and the Supreme Court.

The real issue runs deeper: how does American society define itself in the context of terrorism – by the rule of law or the rule of fear? The proposed McCain-Lieberman bill suggests a problematic stop-gap measure that significantly violates the rights of suspects. The examples from India and Israel highlight the danger of panic legislation, ultimately overturned.

Although we must address - and resolve – the trinity of detention, interrogation and trial, discarding core principles is not the way. I have proposed the establishment of national security court in conjunction withMiranda guarantees for detainees. A protectionless interrogation regime predicated on indefinite detention does not contribute to counterterrorism. All it does is reflect panic. That has not worked before – why should it work now?


Amos N. Guiora is Professor of Law at SJ Quinney College of Law, the University of Utah; his latest book isFreedom from Religion: Rights and National Security (Oxford University Press, 2009).

Indonesian students protest Barack Obama's visit

Fri Mar 5, 7:53 am ET

JAKARTA, Indonesia – Scores of Islamic students staged protests outside Jakarta's parliament and in at least three other major Indonesian cities on Friday against President Barack Obama's upcoming visit to this predominantly Muslim country.

The students carried banners branding Obama as an enemy of Islam and an imperialist in downtown Jakarta as well as in the provincial capitals Padang, Yogyakarta and Surabaya.

They also threw shoes at large pictures of Obama's head. An Iraqi journalist was sentenced to a year in prison for throwing his shoes atU.S. President George W. Bush during a news conference in Baghdad in 2008.

Protest organizer Ahmad Irhamul Fikri, spokesman for the Coordinating Board for Campus Proselytizing Institute, said bigger rallies will be staged next Friday in more Indonesian cities ahead of Obama's March 20-22 visit.

Such demonstrations of hostility toward Obama are rare in Indonesia, where he enjoys widespread popularity because he spend part of his childhood in Jakarta while his mother was married to his Indonesian stepfather.

Local government officials allowed business people to erect a statue of a 10-year-old Obama in a Jakarta park in December. But it was shifted last month to a nearby elementary school that he attended after more than 50,000 people supported a Facebook campaign against it and court action was threatened.

Obama is expected to sign the statue's pedestal while in Jakarta.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100305/ap_on_re_as/as_indonesia_obama